Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, Explanation, Elaboration, Write dan Evaluation (POE2WE) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Matematis

Rosiati Rima Pratiwi, Dedek Kustiawati, Firdausi -

Abstract


Computational thinking ability which is one of the essential skills for students to face the 5.0 era is still relatively low. This study aims to analyze the comparison of mathematical computational thinking ability of students who received POE2WE learning model treatment and students who received conventional learning model treatment. This research method is a quasi-experiment with Post Test Only Randomized Control Group design. The results showed that the mathematical computational thinking ability of students who were taught with POE2WE learning model was higher than students who were taught with conventional learning model. Thus, the POE2WE learning model has an effect on students' mathematical computational thinking ability.

Keywords: POE2WE Learning Model; Mathematical Computational Thinking Ability.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aisy, A. R., & Hakim, D. L. (2023). Kemampuan Berfikir Komputasi Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Pola Bilangan. Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v5i2.6083

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185

Anggraini, H., Haryono, S. E., Muntomimah, S., Wijayanti, R., & Akbar, M. R. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Berbasis Individual Differences. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 7(1), 64–74.

Apiati, V., & Muslim, S. R. (2024). Pengembangan Modul dengan Model POE2WE (Prediction, Observation, Explanation, Elaboration, Write, dan Evaluation) dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Mahasiswa. Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika, 5(1), 634–638. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v5i1

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education - Implications for policy and practice. In Joint Research Centre (JRC). https://doi.org/10.2791/792158

Jamna, N. D., Hamid, H., & Bakar, M. T. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan berpikir Komputasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.33387/jpgm.v2i3.5149

Kalelioglu, F., Gulbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596.

Komarudin, Rani, O. M., & Netriwati. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Penalaran Matematis: Dampak Model Pembelajaran Prediction, Observation, Explanation, Elaboration, Write, And Evaluation. Edu Sains, 10(2), 120–131.

Laelasari, I., & Maisyanah. (2022). Digital Literacy Level Analysis of Pre-service Biology Teacher Integrated Islamic Values. Journal of Biology Education, 5(2), 108–119.

Laelasari, I. (2021). Analysis of the Implementation of Technology-based Outdoor Learning Model in Science Subject (Plant Diversity) Analisis Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Model Outdoor Learning Berbasis Teknologi Pada Pembelajaran IPA (Keragaman Tumbuhan). Elementary, 7(1), 14–25.

Lestari, A. C., & Annizar, A. M. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah PISA Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi. Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 46– 55. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.2063

Lestari, S., & Roesdiana, L. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Program Linear. RANGE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.32938/jpm.v4i2.3592

Lubis, A. P., & Yahfizham. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa Sma Menggunakan Software Geogebra Pada Materi Transformasi Geometri. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 24–31.

Mannila, L., Dagiene, V., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Mirolo, C., Rolandsson, L., & Settle, A. (2014). Computational thinking in K-9 education. ITiCSE-WGR 2014 - Working Group Reports of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2713609.2713610

Nana, & Surahman, E. (2020). POE2WE Model as an Alternative for Learning Physics in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 397, 1013–1022.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in

Education. PISA. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Permatasari, Y. M., Alifiani, & Fathani, A. H. (2021). Model Pembelajaran POE2WE

Bebantuan E-Module Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Materi Integral Tak Tentu Fungsi Aljabar Kelas XI SMA Widyagama Malang. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 16(19), 87–93.

Rara Veronica, A., Yuli Eko Siswono, T., & Wiryanto, W. (2022). Hubungan Berpikir Komputasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Polya pada Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v5i1.7977

Rijal Kamil, M., Ihsan Imami, A., Prasetyo Abadi, A., Matematika, P., & Singaperbangsa Karawang, U. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir komputasional matematis Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Cikampek pada materi pola bilangan. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 259–270.

Widyanti, R. T., Rohana, & Surmilasari, N. (2024). Pengaruh Model PMRI terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Materi Bangun Ruang. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2), 1299–1308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i2.6513

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Zahid, M. Z. (2020). Telaah kerangka kerja PISA 2021: era integrasi computational thinking dalam bidang matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3, 706– 713. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.